On 7/07/2015 3:31 PM, Gregory Orange wrote: > Hi Olli and ports@, > > I don't know if this is a helpful forum to raise it, but I would like to > request that SASL be enabled in the default build options for > mail/postfix. I am attempting to use binary-only packages wherever > possible, and so far this is the first where I currently have to build > it myself. > > I would have thought SASL is in use across many Postfix installations, > but of course I could be wrong. I was tempted to try out > SMTP-after-IMAP, but since Postfix has the support, I think SASL is far > cleaner. > > Would any responders please include me in the CC? I am not subscribed to > the list. > > Thanks, > Greg. >
If consensus can't be achieved or there is a good reason not to enable this by default, then postfix-sasl as a slave port may be a desirable alternative, which I believe has existed in the past. I'm generally: +1 on security related options enabled by default +1 on OPTIONS_DEFAULT matching upstream defaults -1 on OPTIONS_DEFAULT introducing large dependency sets ./koobs _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
