Alphons van Werven wrote: > Walter Schwarzenfeld wrote: > > >> But this could be overwritten with the next update. >> > [snip] > >> But this could also [sic] overwritten. >> > > You're using portsnap for your updates, I presume? Subversion will not > override local changes (at least not without asking first). I have a tree > here that contains local ports and locally modified ports. That's exactly > why I use SVN instead of portsnap. > > You might get similar results if you use Git to update your tree, I don't > know about that. > > HTH, > > AvW > > You know you can all run your own portsnap server to allow you to include local changes?
-- Michelle Sullivan http://www.mhix.org/ _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
