> Umm probably a really bad idea... consider this or something more
> creative/descriptive:
>
> .if ${OPSYS} == FreeBSD && ${OSVERSION} < 1000000 && ${WITH_OPENSSL_PORT} !=
> "yes"
> BROKEN= You must set WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=yes in /etc/make.conf on
> Pre 10.x
> .endif
>
>
> ... the idea instead of silently turning it on which could cause a myriad of
> hell for production systems where some ports are compiled against
> security/openssl and some against the base openssl... stop the compile and
> tell the user what they have to do to resolve it... which will then make
> anything else use the same openssl and lessen the dependency/library issues
> that could happen.
Actually, I just noticed (when compiling the port), that the Makefile now says:
WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=yes
GNUTLS_CONFIGURE_WITH= gnutls
GNUTLS_LIB_DEPENDS= libgnutls.so:security/gnutls
POLARSSL_CONFIGURE_WITH=mbedtls
POLARSSL_LIB_DEPENDS= libmbedtls.so:security/polarssl13
.include <bsd.port.options.mk>
.if ${OPSYS} == FreeBSD && ${OSVERSION} < 1000000
WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=yes
.endif
Which means that the ports version is used regardless of OSVERSION...
Shall I open a PR for it and incorporate the BROKEN= approach?
Martin
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
