On 2016-04-07 08:43, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 02:59:06PM +0200, Michael Grimm wrote:
Baptiste Daroussin <b...@freebsd.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 02:42:06PM +0200, Michael Grimm wrote:
>> 26 seconds for 74 ports within a jail and pkg-1.6.4:
[…]
>> 309 seconds for the very same 74 ports within the very same jail and
pkg-1.7.0:
[…]
>> Is this an expected slow-down? /usr/ports/UPGRADE and
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/ports-mgmt/pkg/?view=log are not indicating
that behavior.
>> But I might have missed something.
>>
>> Any feedback is highly appriciated, thanks, and regards,
>
> pkg 1.7 is IO intensive that may explain.
Ok, understood.
JFTR: perl (24s), python27 (44s), and ruby (125s) take the longest
time to reinstall.
> I plan to readd some improvements on this side before 1.8
Good to know, thanks for your feedback.
Just to follow up on the performance issue, there is a regression that
happened
on FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE (also HEAD) that causes pkg extraction process
to be 10
times slower as it should. r297626 fixes it in head. We are working on
bringing
that into the 10 branch:
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=297626
Thanks for the fix! Will this also be fixed in 10.3-RELEASE? Being
"stuck" with
the RELEASE branch per policy and looking forward to that kind of
performance
for the next two years is really painful.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
