Hi Fernando +1
> I think we should add it. Is a PR necessary? Please send me a patch. Best, Nakata Maho 2016-09-29 6:47 GMT+09:00 Fernando Herrero Carrón <elfe...@gmail.com>: > Hi everyone, > > There are many scientific packages in ports with depend on libraries > providing BLAS/LAPACK functionality. There are several implementations > available, which mainly exploit multicore CPUs, and the ports > infrastructure helps ports handle these dependencies. > > I would like to suggest a couple of improvements: > > * Mk/Uses/blaslapack.mk currently offers support for: atlas, gotoblas, > netlib and openblas. Mk/bsd.options.desc.mk offers descriptions for all > except gotoblas, I think we should add it. Is a PR necessary? > > * There is a vanilla/single-core implementation: math/blas and math/lapack. > I don't know if they are useful any more, but I think blaslapack.mk should > also offer these options, for completeness. > > Comments on this? > > Best regards, > Fernando > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > -- -- Nakata Maho http://accc.riken.jp/maho/ , JA OOO http://ja.openoffice.org/ http://blog.goo.ne.jp/nakatamaho/ ,GPG: http://accc.riken.jp/maho/maho.pgp.txt _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"