> On 18 May, 2017, at 12:45, Joseph Mingrone <j...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > Adam Weinberger <ad...@adamw.org> writes: > >>> On 18 May, 2017, at 12:25, Adam Weinberger <ad...@adamw.org> wrote: > >>>> On 18 May, 2017, at 12:22, Luca Pizzamiglio <luca.pizzamig...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: > >>>> Hi, > >>>> node6 is the LTS, node is the current. From a stability point of view, >>>> node6 is the choice, but node (7) is already widely used. >>>> Probably, the best solution would be to provide the desired node >>>> version via Mk/bsd.default-versions.mk and then all ports depends to >>>> the common version (like perl, python, ...). > >>>> In the meanwhile, node can be the new default for yarn and the >>>> conflict will be solved (and it will be coherent with npm) > >>> Luca, > >>> You're completely right, we really need a USES=node (and there are multiple >>> attempts at it currently floating around). In the meantime, I think you're >>> making the right choice setting www/node as the yarn >>> default. > >>> # Adam > >> Committed in r441191. Thanks, Luca. > >> # Adam > > Thanks all. I will abandon https://reviews.freebsd.org/D10696.
Sorry, Joseph, I wasn't aware of that phab. The update in it is still relevant though; no need to abandon that. # Adam -- Adam Weinberger ad...@adamw.org https://www.adamw.org _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
