Le 07/11/2017 à 16:54, Miroslav Lachman a écrit : > What is the best way to maintain local ports tree changes? > > I am building packages in poudriere, 4 different sets for 2 archs (8 > sets in total). > > I have some local ports and some changes to official ports. Now we are > planing to do some small changes in ports/Mk too.
I would advise against patching the framework directly, most things are configurable, what problems do you have with ports/Mk ? Are you aware of the Mk/bsd.local.mk file that is there to allow you to not change the other files ? As for the ports, you can also add a Makefile.local that will be parsed after the main Makefile, it may help you depending on what you change in existing ports. > So what is the best way to get ports tree in sync with official ports > tree but keep our local changes without a need to apply patches > manually over and over? > > What are you guys using for this scenario? > > Kind regards > Miroslav Lachman > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > -- Mathieu Arnold
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
