On 8 Dec, 2017, at 20:11, Chris H <bsd-li...@bsdforge.com> wrote:
On Sat, 9 Dec 2017 02:59:28 +0100 "Kurt Jaeger" <li...@opsec.eu> said
Hi!
> > > First, there is movement afoot to remove sendmail from FreeBSD and
> > > replace it with dma(1).
> Hmm. This does not come as good news to me. I've been working on an
antispam
> system that targets the use of Sendmail,
If sendmail is available via ports, wouldn't that be enough ?
Thanks for the reply, Kurt.
Perhaps. Haven't tried it yet (means even more work). :(
But hopefully.
I thought all my work would have been more valuable, given that Sendmail
was installed by default in FreeBSD. Disappointing, but perhaps still
doable.
Time will tell.
Hi Chris,
I’d argue that if your work loses value if sendmail is removed from base
(suggesting that users wouldn’t choose sendmail when given an option from
ports), then that suggests that sendmail isn’t the right thing to include
in base. Base should ship with the thing that we expect the majority of
users to WANT to choose.
Clearly there are many users who still prefer sendmail. Your work still has
value!
# Adam
--
Adam Weinberger
ad...@adamw.org
http://www.adamw.org
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
