On 11/12/17 23:41, Matthew D. Fuller wrote: > On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 11:32:08PM +0000 I heard the voice of > Oliver Schonrock, and lo! it spake thus: >> and it solves my issue as well. Don't think the CPUTYPE stuff comes >> into it. > Well, maybe. From your mail, though, it looks like you did that > testing by rebuilding/installing the ports _on the local machine_, > rather than rebuilding in poudriere. If the poudriere box was > building binaries with instructions not in your local machine, that > local build would bypass that issue, so it may still be there. > "Illegal instruction" seems like an odd presentation for "missing > file".
It's a good point, I get ya. You're right, I did not retest the poudriere build. The Poudriere machine has a: Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-4130T: Haswell (4th gen) The machine that is throwing the "Illegal instruction" error, is a VirtualBox VM running on an: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600 CPU: Sandy Bridge (2nd gen) Our production machines are all: CPU: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 4386: "Seoul" (32 nm) Ideally I would like to be able to use the packages built by the i3-4130 machine to run without hitches across all 3 CPU types, while still taking advantage of their features for openssl/TLS, etc. What would be a good CPUTYPE line for make.conf? I am non-the-wiser from the docs in /usr/share/examples/etc/make.conf -- Oliver Schönrock Mobile : +44 7880 617 446 email : oli...@schonrocks.com
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
