On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 04:28:43AM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > 29.12.2017 4:16, Bob Willcox wrote: > > >> In fact, ports/devel is first but not only category having similar problem > >> with p5-* stuff: > >> > >> $ cd /usr/ports > >> $ find . -type d -mindepth 1 -maxdepth 1 | while read category; do printf > >> "%15s " ${category#./}; ls $category | sed 's/-.*//' | sort | uniq -c | > >> sort -rn | head -1; done | sort -k 2,2 -rn | head -15 > >> devel 1908 p5 > >> www 807 p5 > >> textproc 617 p5 > >> net 327 p5 > >> databases 259 p5 > >> security 258 p5 > >> math 146 p5 > >> mail 145 p5 > >> graphics 100 p5 > >> editors 98 libreoffice > >> sysutils 75 rubygem > >> converters 72 p5 > >> misc 63 p5 > >> net-mgmt 56 p5 > >> x11-toolkits 49 p5 > >> > > > > Yeah, I happened to notice the py-* stuff due to some problems I have been > > having with synth. I did notice the large number of p5-* subdirs but didn't > > count them. :) > > > > Certainly seems to be out of control... > > I like we have all this p5-* stuff in the Ports. > It seems that 1900+ devel/p5-* ports justify new p5-devel or devel-p5 > category, though. > > But wouldn't such large move become a nightmare for users updating their > systems?
Yeah, I don't mind them being in there (have to admit that I haven't ever been a perl fan, not since Larry Wall's first version in the '80s), and agree with you that we should give them their own directory (or directories). I think the py-* entries could stand the same treatment. -- Bob Willcox | If everything is coming your way, you're in the b...@immure.com | wrong lane. Austin, TX | _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"