On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 05:07:22AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote: > On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 01:59:50PM +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 10:14:06PM +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > > > UPDATING entry says it should be upgraded automatically but it was not. > > > > > > "People using Poudriere 3.2+ and binary packages do not have to do > > > anything." > > > > Mmmmm, well, this sentence is partly right, and partly wrong. > > > > If you install a PHP app, say wordpress, you do not have anything to do > > because pkg will install the new pecl package and remove the old ones. > > > > On the other hand, if you install php/pear/pecl ports manually, you do > > have to rename them. > > > > I will update the UPDATING entry. > > .... > > How would someone performing only binary package updates know to look at > ports/UPDATING, and how would that be done? Such an installation may > well not have /usr/ports at all.
I assumed pkg updating worked without a /usr/ports, seems I was wrong. -- Mathieu Arnold
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature