Hello list, I'm probably not alone in considering git to be a core development tool, perhaps just a notch or two below the C compiler. `git` and `sudo` are the two packages I first install (after `pkg` itself) on any machine, and in many cases that suffices to get a basic development environment going.
However, the git package currently brings in a host of unwanted dependencies, and I *believe* they can be done without. This is the complete dependency graph for the git package [0] (generated with the newly-minted pkg-graph [1]). It pulls in perl5 and python27, both sizeable packages and both not required to use git. While git can be compiled without some of the additional dependencies such as expat or pcre, this results in a "crippled" git lacking in some core features, and requires special build-time definitions like NO_EXPAT or NO_PCRE passed to the git Makefile. The other dependencies like curl, pcre, and gettext are also relatively small and typically part of even the most minimal system, but perl5 and python27 are full-blown runtimes for interpreted languages that have fallen out of favor and have been successfully stripped from FreeBSD core (and even many Linux distributions). I'm sure these packages are not just there to have a good time and they serve some purpose and enable a subset of the git functionality, but my question here today is whether that functionality is worth its weight in dependencies, and whether the ports team is open to seeing the git package stripped of these dependencies. (Obviously the option of adding a "git-lite" package à la "vim-lite" also exists, but I think it's fair to say that would be an ugly and unnecessary compromise.) [0]: https://goo.gl/hozu1b [1]: https://github.com/neosmart/pkg-graph Many thanks, Mahmoud Al-Qudsi NeoSmart Technologies _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
