Hi! > >> > What about the LICENSE=NONE setting ? It stops the port from being build > >> > in poudriere ?
> > So, does it sound sensible to define a LICENSE that one has to special-case > > immediatly just to do a test-build ? I mean, don't we all have better things > > to do than shooting ourselves in the feet ? > > There is really no license information about this software. So > according to license framework of FreeBSD ports there isn't anything > wrong about adding 'LICENSE=NONE' in Makefile of this port. The same is true for not adding a LICENSE line in this case. > And if it > is really problematic then what should be fixed is license framework > itself or behavior of poudriere about it rather than license > information of this port. Ad-hocism doesn't pay in the long run. There is no other LICENSE=NONE instance in the ports tree. -- p...@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 One year to go ! _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
