On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 10:52:45AM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote: > The issue is that FLAVORS has added a substantial (and painful) complexity to > python ports and python.mk. It means that a number of people have had to be > hyper-vigilant and watch commits closely to catch errors introduced when > people utilize the paradigm incorrectly. It’s a bitter pill, but it’s > accepted because the use-case for multiple concurrent python versions is > essential. > > As Antoine said, inconsistency isn’t a strong enough use case. Which brings > us back to the original question: is there a specific use-case for concurrent > ruby that makes the substantial increase in cognitive load, complexity, and > monitoring worth it?
PHP also have FLAVORS. What about PHP? Multiple concurrent PHP versions is essential? -- meta <m...@freebsd.org> _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
