Re: Timidity++ needs libarc as run dependency ??

[Marcin Cieslak]

On Thu, 27 Feb 2020, Mateusz Piotrowski wrote:

On 2/26/20 3:20 PM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:

On 2020-02-26 13:18, Mateusz Piotrowski wrote:

On 2/26/20 10:55 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:

ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libarc.so.1" not found, required by "timidity"

pkg install libarc

I've never used timidity myself, so I am not sure why this is this way.

It looks like libarc is already included in LIB_DEPENDS. It is not included in the timidity++ package. It is only included with the timidity++-${PKGNAMESUFFIX} packages (like timidity++-emacs). Is there a reason why you installed timidity++ instead of one of the timidity++-${PKGNAMESUFFIX} packages?

No specific reason. I just wanted to test some MIDI files.

And did "pkg instal xxx". Is timidity++ not a valid port/package?

It is a valid port. I am not sure why libarc is not a run-time dependency here. Maybe just an oversight.

Maybe there is some bug with

.if !defined(PKGNAMESUFFIX)

during package building?

Marcin

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature