Hi! > On 24.05.20 15:00, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > > >> This PR was two months old, before recently an RCE was discovered that > >> would very much like to see fixed in ports.
> Sure, was already at it, then I stumbled about the syntax for how to > report what combination of version and PORTREVISION to report for slave > ports, as they don't follow the same numbering scheme. > > These are the port versions / revision not affected anymore > > qmail-1.06_5 > qmail-tls-1.06_3 > qmail-mysql-1.06_2 > > Am I supposed to bump all PORTREVISION to the same number or do I have > to add entries for each slaveport? The <affects> section doesn't seem to > have a concept of different version for slave ports. Use three vuxml entries, one for each port (referencing 3 CVEs per entry). -- p...@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 Now what ? _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"