On 2021-03-25 22:24, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
Hi!
Why does our work have so little value that portmgr@ is unwilling
to keep us all in the loop, or consider our opinions on such matters?
The portmgr@ role is a huge task and all the reasons (limited time,
dayjobs, etc) ares valid for those folks from portmgr as for
the rest of the ports maintainers and committers.
Indeed, and don't think that hadn't occurred to me. In fact I suspected
that portmgr@ was feeling a bit overwhelmed, and that *that* triggered
the seemingly overreaching python announcement.
May I humbly request a petition for such large-sweeping changes? IMHO
this will give portmgr@ the opportunity to get caught up, and perhaps
get some assistance -- maybe we all come up with an idea that saves
_everyones_ bacon. :-)
Thanks for the thoughtful reply.
--Chris
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
