On 01 Apr 2021, at 04:19, Felix Palmen <fe...@palmen-it.de> wrote: > * Christoph Moench-Tegeder <c...@burggraben.net> [20210326 19:45]: >> ## Felix Palmen (fe...@palmen-it.de): >>> I'd assume (someone may correct me) that portsnap will still be >>> supported,
>> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2020-August/119098.html > Is this finally decided, and is there a timeline? That post I read as the official decision that port snap was going to die. But WITHOUT_PORTSANP added to the default base would be the single, I'd think. Most of the ground work has already been done. > portsnap is still built by default on releng/13.0. We'll see if it makes it to RELEASE or not. gitup is working well right now, but it looks more fiddly and I wish the 'fake JSON' configuration file was actual valid JSON, OTOH, it seems o run a lot faster than portsnap. -- I WILL NOT TRADE PANTS WITH OTHERS Bart chalkboard Ep. 7F05 _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
