Hi Nikolai, On 1/29/17 23:18, Nikolai Lifanov wrote: > I think the biggest controversy is that binary names are suffixed, which > may not be what upstream projects like and/or document. > It may be confusing to users as well. > > If we can get rid of the suffix for PYTHON_CONCURRENT_INSTALL for > whichever version is PYTHON_DEFAULT, it should be a net positive to > treat it the same way we did USE_GCC in the past (enable > PYTHON_NO_CONCURRENT or something and remove it on per-port basis once > fixed).
The way you describe it makes me think I'm missing something. The way concurrent works right now, the default version of python gets a script with no suffix, so there's no suffix to get rid of. Are there cases where the presence of suffixed binaries conflicts with upstream and/or causes confusion to users, provided that binaries (or at least symlinks to them) are also present? -J
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
