In the last episode (Jul 25), Eric Dedrick said:
> > Just to clarify, I mean that using portupgrade will (hopefully, and
> > in my experience, almost always) take care of your dependencies
> > during the upgrade process, thus saving you from the IMO less
> > preferable alternative of running more than one version of a port.
> >
> > Have you tried portupgrade with linux_base (after a backup of the
> > old linux_base port skeleton and installation of the new one) to
> > see whether Maple is happy?
>
> Yup. portupgrading eliminates ld-linux.so.1, required by maple.
> Thanks for the suggestion, though.
Hm. It shouldn't, since linux_base and linux_base-6 are different
ports. Unless you had the RH6 version of linux_base, then installed
linux_base-6, then upgraded linux_base to the RH7 version. The upgrade
of linux_base would have effectively wiped out the linux_base-6
install.
--
Dan Nelson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
