>> (10.08.2002 @ 1514 PST): Oliver Fromme said, in 1.2K: <<
> ln [-fhinv] existing_filename [another_filename]
> ln -s [-fhinv] symlink_target [symlink_name]
>
> That would be completely clear, IMO. Although maybe a bit
> too verbose.
too verbose? i disagree.
> (OK, in the case of symlinks it doesn't really
> have to exist), and the new thing comes last.
most people who would benefit from having ln spelled out for them
probably won't be doing terribly difficult things with it ::)
-Adam
--
"Oh good, my dog found the chainsaw."
-Lilo, "Lilo & Stitch"
Adam Weinberger
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
