Is it a best practice to include debuging options in a -STABLE tree kernel?
I have read the following article which suggests that a business-as- usual practice should be to include debugging options. >http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2002/03/21/Big_Scary_Daemons.html?page=1 The kernel developer's handbook (http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/developers-handbook/kerneldebug.html) does not offer an opinion Is there some alternative thinking? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Joe Sotham ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Christianity got over the difficulty of furious opposites by keeping them both and keeping them furious. - G.K. Chesterton To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
