question... having never dealt with IPFW and nat, does ipnat.conf need to exist? i wonder this because it seems like a great majority of problems that exist with IPF can be solved by having a correct ipnat.conf. Charles Pelletier Tech. Coordinator St Luke's School
----- Original Message ----- From: "Nick Rogness" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Alan McKay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:16 PM Subject: Re: help with webcam through natd + ipfw > On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Alan McKay wrote: > > > > > > What does `ipfw -a l` show? > > > > That seems to be the same as "ipfw show", which I used to determine that > > there do not seem to be any 'deny' rules hit. So I cannot really tell > > where those packets are going. I can hit my port 80 from work no > > problem (www.bodensatz.com), but 8080 no deal. So it seems to be going > > through some allow rule, but I'm not sure which. > > > If indeed your internal machine is excepting connections on port > 8080 (can be tested from the firewall box using telnet) then this > sounds like a firewalling problem. Set your firewall type to > OPEN, reboot and see if it works. If it does, then you need to > examine your firewall rules better. > > There is really nothing special about what your doing if the > firewall is correct. > > Also, to help troubleshoot more, I would recommend using ipfw log > statements as well as the natd log option. > > Nick Rogness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > - > "Wouldn't it be great if we could answer people with a > kick to the crotch?" [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
