> --- John Bleichert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Rotaru Razvan wrote: > > > > > Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 09:38:06 -0800 (PST) > > > From: Rotaru Razvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: looking for a lightweight web server > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > I am looking for a lightweight web server with php support to set > > up on > > > my FreeBSD system. > > > It is very likely that the only use for that web server will be > > > phpMyAdmin so it should be multithreading and all that stuff. I > > want > > > something small and very fast (i have a k6-2 500MHz system). If > > > somebody knows can recommend me one i'll be thankfull. All this > > > searching gives me a headache... :) > > > > > > Regards, > > > Razvan > > > > > > > What's wrong with apache? > > > > On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Rotaru Razvan wrote:
> Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 09:58:05 -0800 (PST) > From: Rotaru Razvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: John Bleichert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Re: looking for a lightweight web server > > Well apache isn't quite lightweight. I was hoping to find something > small, that eats as few recources as possible. I don't need cgi > support, perl and other stuff like that. Only html+php. > It's not like i don't like apache. I just think it's not suited for my > kind of application. > If you still think i should use apache please tell me, because right > now i don't know what to think. > Apache is fairly thin by itself. When you add PHP support Apache's resource usage is amplified by probably 10x. If you want to keep your resource usage down, don't use PHP. Especiallynot soley for an administrative app. Heck, I think even Perl is thinner than PHP, in fact that's why I moved to it. Apache is your server. # John Bleichert # http://vonbek.dhs.org/latest.jpg To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
