On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 03:09:12PM -0800, David Schultz wrote: > Thus spake Cliff Sarginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > LINT says: > > > ># > > > ># Add support for the EXT2FS filesystem of Linux fame. Be a bit > > > ># careful with this - the ext2fs code has a tendency to lag behind > > > ># changes and not be exercised very much, so mounting read/write could > > > ># be dangerous (and even mounting read only could result in panics.) > > > ># > > > >options EXT2FS > > > > > This message has been in LINT since the dawn of time and is extremely > > mystifying. "Be a bit careful" .. meaning what ? You either mount it or > > don't mount it, use it or don't use it. What exactly are you supposed to > > be careful of :) Saying "Boo!". > > FreeBSD support for ext2fs is a specific instance of the more > general problem that features that very few people care about tend > not to get maintained. FreeBSD already has a filesystem that is > more complete and faster than ext2fs,[1] so the only people using > both UFS and ext2fs are also running Linux. If you mount an > ext2fs filesystem r/w, consider yourself a beta tester. > Oh I am not comparing their relative merits. But the thing is there are people who for one reason or another run heterogenous networks. I mean it is not a crime to run both Linux and FreeBSD (or is it ?). My feeling is that it is a shame that is all.
As for your scathing comment about the evolution of EXT2, I have no comment since it sounds like opinion rather than fact. As a matter of interest in the new book "Absolute BSD" it states fairly definitely that you can freely use EXT2FS. And I believe the book has the blessing of several key people (I just looked at the names). So ... -- Regards Cliff Sarginson The Netherlands [ This mail has been checked as virus-free ] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
