Michael C. Shultz wrote: > It would be nice if the ports make options were better documented, but > you can read through /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk and find information > on the various options. > > here is an example: > > # all-depends-list > # - Show all directories which are dependencies > # for this port. > > then > > cd /usr/ports/lang/ezm3/ > make all-depends-list > > result: > > /usr/ports/converters/libiconv > /usr/ports/devel/gettext > /usr/ports/devel/gmake > /usr/ports/devel/libtool15 > > -Mike >
Mike, That's great info, thank you. It really helps put this into perspective. I did portmanager -sl and it identifies 7 candidates for deletion. It identifies cvsup-without-gui and also identifies ezm3 upon which it depends. Am I missing something here or shouldn't ezm3 not been identified as a "leaf port"? Jay _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
