"mail.schatti.ch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If you had to choose amongst the available filesystems on 5.4 to > contain just about 500kB to a MB, which would you use, and with what > parameters ? Which of these has the lowest administration overhead, > the lowest space overhead ?
Generally I go with FAT for small media. If it's going to be a really active filesystem, then UFS will give better speed. _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
