On Sun, 31 Jul 2005 13:48:07 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gary W. Swearingen) wrote: > dick hoogendijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Any ideas about _WHAT_ does not work? Do you have examples? > > "If I can't live without them, then.." ;-)) > I forget, but too many for me. Found somebody with Google that got > several "broken" things running, but he didn't say how. > > I had a few problems with base-system stuff but probably could have > lived with that. (Eg, I had to use older ncr instead of sym.) The > problems are with the ports, so waiting for 6.x won't help.
I keep on wondering what will be best for this new amd64 machine. Today I saw all KDE packages were anewed. I have a fbsd-4.11-stable machine that has KDE running. My other machines have 5.4, so I cannot build the 4.11 packages on one of those (faster) machines. And then there's this dicussion on the speed of 5.4 <-> 4.11 (the latter is said to be faster). Maybe it's just to early to make the switch to 5.x if all options needed are supported in 4.11-stable. If I install the latter on the new amd64 machine (dump /restore) I will have a very fast machine (i386) which can build the packages for the main server too. HOW LONG will FreeBSD-4.11 be supported ?? (could not find it on the website) -- dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 4.11-stable ++ FreeBSD 5.4 + Nai tiruvantel ar vayuvantel i Valar tielyanna nu vilja _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
