On 10/3/05, Dinesh Nair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/01/05 00:08 Andrew P. said the following: > > linuxthreads were only important on FreeBSD 4.x. > > Starting with 5.x we have a more efficient threading > > model. Extensive testing did not reveal any significant > > is this definitive, i.e. that on 5.x linuxthreads are worse off than native > freebsd threads ? i'm not trying to be a troll, but over on the asterisk > mailing lists, we're in the midst of discussing if /usr/ports/net/asterisk > should be using linuxthreads or pthreads by default. on 4.x (which i'm > still on), linuxthreads has oodles better performance than native pthreads, > but i havent really done any testing on 5.x or 6.x. > > any advice here would be much appreciated. > > -- > Regards, /\_/\ "All dogs go to heaven." > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (0 0) http://www.alphaque.com/ > +==========================----oOO--(_)--OOo----==========================+ > | for a in past present future; do | > | for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do | > | echo "The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b." | > | done; done | > +=========================================================================+ >
Yes, it's definitely so. Google for a few minutes and you'll see it for yourself. Stick with native threads. _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"