On 10/16/05, Peter Matulis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- Petersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Uninstalled dependancies of an installed port are irrelevant in > > any portupgrade case, as the port will automatically pull them in > as > > part of its compilation. > > What if a port now has a new dependency? > > But back to 'r', > > My system shows this: > > --------------------------------------------------- > $ pkg_info -xR openldap > Information for openldap-client-2.2.29: > > Required by: > bluefish-1.0.4 > dirmngr-0.9.2 > gnome-menus-2.10.2_1 > gnomevfs2-2.10.1_1 > gnupg-devel-1.9.19 > gtksourceview-1.2.1 > libbonoboui-2.10.1 > libgnomeui-2.10.1_1 > rox-2.3 > samba-libsmbclient-3.0.20_2 > --------------------------------------------------- > > Just to be clear on this, if I do... > > # portupgrade -r openldap-client > > ...all those listed ports will be recompiled whether they need to be > or not? That seems mighty inefficient. > > > > > > > __________________________________________________________ > Find your next car at http://autos.yahoo.ca > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > >
No, they won't. Honestly guys, what is this thread about? You're not gonna make portupgrade work any faster or smoother if you weed out a couple of switches from the command-line. I don't mean to bother anyone if you're having fun, but it just seems that portupgrade's manpage covers it all. If you're not sure - just try it. If something's strange - see if it's a bug, and if you're sure it is - send-pr. chat@ is the right place for topics like this one.. Cheerz, Andrew P. _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"