Thanks again Andrew,

I will do a search on COM Hubs and see whats out there. I assume, the HUB would connect to one controll terminal, then to each COM port on the servers.

I have been reading (pouring over and over) the man and handbook pages to see if more than one console can be specified at a time.

If all goes well, it looks like we should be able to do anything from the serial port, short of physicaly pushing the power button!

-Grant

----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrew P." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Grant Peel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2005 8:44 AM
Subject: Re: Remote Console


On 10/16/05, Grant Peel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks Andrew,

So If I understand your reply, a setup like this should always give me
access to any of the servers by SSHing to one server, then CUing to get to
the console of the 'broken' one, regardless of its state (assuming the disks
are OK, and boot stage 1 worked):

(WAN Shown, LAN Same, using seperate nics on Servers and Switch)


                                  ISP's router
                                        |
                                    My Switch
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                  |                    |                   |
|
Serv1            Serv2                Serv3               Serv4
Serv5

Serial1--------->Serial2
                 Serial1------------->Serial2
                                      Serial1------------>Serial2

Serial1---------->Serial2

Can more than 1 console access type be specified in loader.conf ?
    i.e.
        console='serialconsole'
        console='videoconsole'

When using 'serial console, does anything have to be specified to use serial
2?

What is the default local console, how is it specified?
i.e. the one you use when you plug a keyboard and monitor directly into
the machine?

Would I need to install any other software other than the client (CU)?

-GRant


I haven't configured comconsoles myself, I just happen
to work at a place where they are used heavily (Sun
ALOM mostly, but built-in LOMs and FreeBSD software
comsonsoles also). Please consult the Handbook and
google, I'm sure there's nothing difficult to it.

I would not support your chaining idea, though. It's
the only one that requires $0.00 budget, but COM
hubs are cheap today. If you rent rackspace, I'm
sure your colocation provider can offer you some
kind of non-expensive remote management. If
rackspace is free, consider buying some hardware
(like a COM hub).

The matter is, that you'll want 9600 bps speeds
for max compatibility. While it is usable for
occasional failure recovery, chaining it would
make it lag too much.



_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to