James Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've been aware of pkgtools.conf but hadn't buckled down to suss out the
> syntax
> prior to recently. Thanks to Dru Lavigne's excellent article at onlamp.com,
> I'm
> working on my first attempt at setting make variables in pkgtools.conf.
>
> First, is there something I've specified incorrectly in my pkgtools.conf
> (below)?
> More generally, I haven't found anything in the portupgrade man page that
> would
> describe a switch that would cause portupgrade to output an indication of what
> configuration information it might have parsed from pkgtools.conf, that would
> help me figure out (sooner in the build process) whether portupgrade is
> parsing
> my pkgtools.conf successfully. Is there some way to make portupgrade be
> verbose
> about what actions it is taking based on pkgtools.conf directives?
>
> Here is the MAKE_ARGS section of /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf:
>
> MAKE_ARGS = {
> 'graphics/ImageMagick-*' => 'WITHOUT_IMAGEMAGICK_TTF=1
> WITHOUT_IMAGEMAGICK_PDF=1 WITHOUT_X11=1 WITHOUT_IMAGEMAGICK_PERL=1',
> }
>
> According to my reading of the Makefile, eliminating TTF and PDF support
> ought to
> be sufficient to eliminate the need for ghostscript, but still, "portupgrade
> -N
> ImageMagick" wants to build ghostscript-gnu-7.07_13 as a dependency.
>
> ns : 22:41:38 /root# ls -l /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf
> -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 13872 Oct 15 21:42 /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf
>
> ns : 22:41:45 /root# grep -1 Magick /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf
> MAKE_ARGS = {
> 'graphics/ImageMagick-*' => 'WITHOUT_IMAGEMAGICK_TTF=1
> WITHOUT_IMAGEMAGICK_PDF=1 WITHOUT_X11=1 WITHOUT_IMAGEMAGICK_PERL=1',
> }
>
> Everything else in pkgtools.conf is stock:
>
> ns : 22:47:01 /root# diff /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf.sample
> /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf
> 310a311
> > 'graphics/ImageMagick-*' => 'WITHOUT_IMAGEMAGICK_TTF=1
> > WITHOUT_IMAGEMAGICK_PDF=1 WITHOUT_X11=1 WITHOUT_IMAGEMAGICK_PERL=1',
>
> After completing a CVS update of my ports tree at 23:08 PDT 10/15/05,
> portupgrade shows all the rest of my ports are up to date.
>
> All of this is on 5.4-STABLE circa 10/1/05.
Offhand, I can't follow all of the ghostscript logic, so you might try
adding WITHOUT_GHOSTSCRIPT.
Also, it might be an indirect dependency. Is one of the other
dependencies pulling it in?
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
