On 2006-02-24 00:56, Robert Huff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jerry McAllister writes: >> For those reasons, I generally make the following partitions. >> >> partition Mount size comments >> a = / (root) 128MB > > May I ask what OS version you're running? Because on my -CURRENT > system: > > huff@>> du /boot | sort -nr > 151838 /boot > 66596 /boot/kernel.old > 66526 /boot/kernel > 17810 /boot/kernel.generic > 20 /boot/defaults > 2 /boot/modules > 2 /boot/firmware
CURRENT usually has larger binaries, because of all the extra debugging information that is customarily enabled in the kernel. On an amd64 system here, the root partition uses even more disk space: # df -m / Filesystem 1M-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/ad0s2a 1583 285 1171 20% / # > Su unless I'm doing sonething that causes bloat, 128mb will be > woefully inadwquate. Possibly. I'd certainly go for a larger root partition than 128 MB, but Jerry has done a great work outlining his partition scheme and why he chose those sizes. The general idea here is that there isn't an easy way to find the One True Partitioning Scheme(TM) -- one that will match everyone's needs for now and all eternity. The original poster should spend some time thinking about what the system will be used for. Then the mechanics of using fdisk(8) and disklabel(8) or bsdlabel(8) are an eays thing to explain :) _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"