On 4/12/06, Paul Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ashley Moran wrote: > > On Wednesday 12 April 2006 02:37, Eric Schuele wrote: > >> Either way... I hope somehow they see fit to loosen the language a bit > >> in the future. > > > > Can't we petition Adobe somehow? I'm a bit stuck now - my company's > main > > application is written in Flash! > > > Petition? How about we sue them? How can a vendor dictate what > platform they allow their software to run on? Just because they > designed it for some other OS doesn't mean, if I can figure out a way to > make it work, that they can tell me I can't run it on that platform.
With the Current EULA, that's exactly what they CAN do I'm not a lawyer either, but frankly I think their EULA is unenforceable > and their attitude ought to cost them customers. I'll agree with you here. Hopefully they'll see the light and change the EULA. -- > Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > Adjunct Information Security Officer > The University of Texas at Dallas > http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ > > > _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"