Lisa,

Your forward file should be something like this:
================================================
$TTL    3600

@ IN      SOA     ns.jellico.com. dnsadmin.jellico.com. (
                                        2003071101      ; serial
                                        3H              ; refresh
                                        1H              ; retry
                                        1W              ; expiry
                                        1D )            ; minimum

; DNS Servers
@       IN NS           ns.jellico.com.
@       IN NS           ns2.jellico.com.

; Machine Names
localhost                       IN A    127.0.0.1

mail            IN A    208.44.26.225
pop             IN A    208.44.26.225
@               IN A    208.44.26.225

; Aliases
www             IN CNAME        @
ww             IN CNAME        @
w             IN CNAME        @

; MX Record
@               IN MX   10      mail.jellico.com.

================================================

Just correct the IP's and add the rest of your hosts, and
correct any names that may be incorrect.  Make sure you name
the file the same as bind is looking for in:
/etc/namedb/named.conf

If you have specific questions to any of the file entries you can email me directly.

        -Derek


At 01:20 PM 7/11/2006, Lisa Casey wrote:
Hi,


The installed bind is not in /usr/local/bin that is where the port is
installed.  You might want to do a:
# which bind

and set rc.conf to the right value for the program.

        -Derek


At 04:34 PM 7/10/2006, Lisa Casey wrote:

----- Original Message ----- From: "Jonathan Chen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lisa Casey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 3:43 PM
Subject: Re: Bind problem


Did you remember to add:
   named_program="/usr/local/sbin/named"
to /etc/rc.conf?

Yes. /etc/rc.conf has the following lines for named:

named_enable="YES"
named_program="/usr/local/sbin/named"
named_flags="-u bind -g bind -c /etc/namedb/named.conf"


Lisa Casey

This actually didn't quite answer the problem, but it did lead me in the right direction to solve it.

which bind, of course, doesn't work and which named just gives me the path to the named executable as given in /etc.rc.conf But, this got me to thinking so I did a find / -name named -print And found something interesting. I have named executables in both /usr/local/sbin and /usr/sbin So I changed the line in /etc/rc.conf that read: named_program="/usr/local/sbin/named" to named_program="/usr/sbin/named" and rebooted the box. So far, so good. named -v gives me BIND 9.3.0 and in /var/messages the reboot info shows the same when named loads:

Jul 11 13:40:50 netlink kernel: Mounting root from ufs:/dev/da0s1a
Jul 11 13:40:50 netlink named[293]: starting BIND 9.3.0 -u bind -c /etc/namedb/n
amed.conf -t /var/named
Jul 11 13:40:51 netlink named[293]: command channel listening on 127.0.0.1#953

(It's also picking  up the command channel, so I guess I did that right).

I have one last problem (or at least I hope so!). I maybe ought to ask this in a bind newsgroup, but there are enough folks on this list running bind on FreeBSD that someone ought to know. Evidently Bind 9 doesn't like my zone files whereas Bind 8 was OK with them. A little background: My main domain name is jellico.com I also host several virtual domains using IP based virtual domains in Apache2. So each of my virtual domains has been assigned an IP address out of my Class C. In /etc/namedb/M (the directory where I keep my zone files that this DNS server is master for) I have (among other zones) jellico.com.db which is my forward file for the domain and 26.44.208.in-addr.arpa which is the reverse zone file for the domain. I have always had my virtual domains configured into my forward file (jellico.com.db) so as to enable forward DNS resolution on those. They are configured into jellico.com.db like this:

jellico.tn.us.  IN      A       208.44.26.225
multi-226       IN      A       208.44.26.226
multi-227       IN      A       208.44.26.227
multi-228       IN      A       208.44.26.228
multi-229       IN      A       208.44.26.229
multi-230       IN      A       208.44.26.230
tspma.com.      IN      A       208.44.26.231
copperhill.com. IN      A       208.44.26.232
multi-233       IN      A       208.44.26.233
www.jellico.net.        IN      A       208.44.26.234
multi-235       IN      A       208.44.26.235
stair-way-to-heaven.com.        IN      A       208.44.26.236
multi-237       IN      A       208.44.26.237
kcsvo.com.      IN      A       208.44.26.238
multi-239       IN      A       208.44.26.239
multi-240       IN      A       208.44.26.240
wingsofvictorychurch.org.       IN      A       208.44.26.241
multi-242       IN      A       208.44.26.242
multi-243       IN      A       208.44.26.243

There are a few others, but you get the idea. I have also always had my virtual domains setup in my reverse file so as to enable reverse DNS resolution on these. This section of my reverse file looks like so:

225     IN      PTR     jellico.tn.us.
226     IN      PTR     multi-226.jellico.com.
227     IN      PTR     multi-227.jellico.com.
228     IN      PTR     multi-228.jellico.com.
229     IN      PTR     multi-229.jellico.com.
230     IN      PTR     multi-230.jellico.com.
231     IN      PTR     tspma.com.
232     IN      PTR     copperhill.com.
233     IN      PTR     multi-233.jellico.com.
234     IN      PTR     www.jellico.net.
234     IN      PTR     multi-234.jellico.com.
235     IN      PTR     multi-235.jellicocom.
236     IN      PTR     stairway-to-heaven.com.

Bind 9 is OK with my reverse file, but it doesn't like any entry in my forward file that ends in a dot (so as not to append jellico.com to it). When I rebooted the box, as soon as the nameserver loads I get these error messages in /var/messages:

Jul 11 13:40:51 netlink named[293]: M/jellico.com.db:222: ignoring out-of-zone d
ata (mail.campbellcounty.com)
Jul 11 13:40:51 netlink named[293]: M/jellico.com.db:224: ignoring out-of-zone d
ata (campbellcounty.com)
Jul 11 13:40:51 netlink named[293]: M/jellico.com.db:522: ignoring out-of-zone d
ata (jellico.tn.us)
Jul 11 13:40:51 netlink named[293]: M/jellico.com.db:528: ignoring out-of-zone d
ata (tspma.com)
Jul 11 13:40:51 netlink named[293]: M/jellico.com.db:529: ignoring out-of-zone d
ata (copperhill.com)
Jul 11 13:40:51 netlink named[293]: M/jellico.com.db:531: ignoring out-of-zone d
ata (www.jellico.net)
Jul 11 13:40:51 netlink named[293]: M/jellico.com.db:533: ignoring out-of-zone d
ata (stair-way-to-heaven.com)
Jul 11 13:40:51 netlink named[293]: M/jellico.com.db:535: ignoring out-of-zone d
ata (kcsvo.com)
Jul 11 13:40:51 netlink named[293]: M/jellico.com.db:538: ignoring out-of-zone d
ata (wingsofvictorychurch.org)
Jul 11 13:40:51 netlink named[293]: M/jellico.com.db:544: ignoring out-of-zone d
ata (netlink2000.net)
Jul 11 13:40:51 netlink named[293]: M/jellico.com.db:549: ignoring out-of-zone d
ata (shamrockweb.com)

I do, of course, also have separate zone files in /etc/namedb/M for each virtual domain, stair-way-to-heaven.com.db, shamrockweb.com.db, wingsofvictorychurch.org.db, etc.

(Finally) here's my question. Bind 8 was evidently quite OK with me defining virtual domains in my forward file as I have done for years. Bind 9 is not happy with this at all. How do I do this in Bind 9? My forward file contains an entry for each IP address of the Class C, I have to call the IP addresses something in my forward file, and that something OUGHT to be the name of the domain that I have assigned that IP address to in order for forward resolution to work correctly. Isn't this right? Sigh, obviously not since Bind is complaining. So how DO I define these virtual domains in my forward file under Bind 9?

Thanks for all the help,

Lisa Casey

_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support.


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support.

_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to