--- "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Jul 13, 2006, at 10:47 AM, Danial Thom > wrote: > > > > > > > --- "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> > >> On Jul 13, 2006, at 9:22 AM, Danial Thom > wrote: > >> > >>> Simply enabling SMP on a single processor > >> system > >>> adds 20-25% overhead in freebsd 6.1. Again, > >>> readily admitted/accepted by the > developers. > >>> There is no way to recover that in > >> efficiency, at > >>> least not for a long time. > >> > >> So don't enable SMP on a single cpu system. > >> Easy enough to avoid. > >> > >> Chad > > > > Don't use SMP, because the overhead stays > with 2 > > processors, with little additional benefit > (as > > other tests show). Easy enough to avoid. > > > > SMP has overhead but FreeBSD on 2 processors > can do more work than > FreeBSD on the same HW with just 1 processor. > That is a fact. > > > Are you people stupid or delusional? > > No, and the data you posted did not support > your allegations of > performance either. > > Chad I doubt you have the capacity to understand the tests, and as they say, you can't educate the woodchucks. DT __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
