Already many of the leading DNSBL lists like spamhaus.org and njbl.org uses
such methods to detect new spammers. We've been using the SBL-XBL + dynablock +
SURBL lists with much success reaching up to 95% reduction in spam and so far
very very very little false positives.
I have noticed the amount of spam I have been getting climbing, so I
needed to crack down.
Thanks, I had SBL but not SBL-XBL. I also added dynablock.njabl.org and
multi.surbl.org.
This is the anti-spam part of my freebsd.mc. That should do the trick.
FEATURE(`dnsbl', `no-more-funn.moensted.dk', `Spammer $&{client_addr}
$&f reject
ed: see http://www.moensted.dk/ (relays)')
FEATURE(`dnsbl',`blackholes.mail-abuse.org',` Mail from $&{client_addr}
rejected
: see http://mail-abuse.org/cgi-bin/lookup?$&; {client_addr}')dnl
FEATURE(`dnsbl',`bl.spamcop.net',` Mail from $&{client_addr} Blocked -
see http:
//www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?$& {client_addr}')dnl
FEATURE(`dnsbl', `sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org', `Spammer $&{client_addr} $&f
rejected:
see http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/index.lasso')
FEATURE(`dnsbl', `list.dsbl.org', `Spammer $&{client_addr} $&f rejected:
see htt
p://dsbl.org/main')
FEATURE(`dnsbl', `bl.kq6up.org', `Spammer $&{client_addr} $&f rejected:
buzz off
spammer')
FEATURE(`dnsbl', `dynablock.njabl.org', `Spammer $&{client_addr} $&f
rejected: s
ee http://www.njabl.org/dynablock.html')
FEATURE(`dnsbl', `multi.surbl.org', `Spammer $&{client_addr} $&f
rejected: see h
ttp://www.surbl.org')
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
