At Tue, 5 Sep 2006 it looks like backyard composed: > > don't get me wrong I don't doubt it is a great system > to use, which is why I kept on trying to get it > installed on many different machines; from laptops to > desktops, to servers, and my commodore... and I will > admit I installed without really looking at the > hardware compatability list... That being said > ususally the boot loader will not load Solaris for me. > The funny thing is when I had it on a machine with > windows it would boot windows, just not Solaris. >
<humbly_snipped> I was just thinking about how much I enjoyed the feeling of doing a successfuly install and configuration of Solaris on a desktop, which was, in my case, not all that often. Whenever I could not get it to install, I'd just install FreeBSD with no problems. Now, that is the ironic, case in point, and I can only speak for myself, but... If just a "relatively" small handful of dedicated FreeBSD coders can produce an OS that will install on damm near "ANYTHING" I always found it troubling that SUN Microsystems, with all it's resources, could not, at the least, make their x86 OS (think Solaris-10) install with support, for lets say, what FreeBSD had for 4.2? I mean, all the drivers are available, wouldn't one think that they could at least support what FreeBSD supports in terms of number of devices? -- Bill Schoolcraft <<<<*>>>> http://wiliweld.com <*> " If you turn your headlights on while going the speed of light, does anything happen? " _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"