On Thursday January 18, 2007 at 08:33:32 (PM) Jay Chandler wrote:

> Murray Taylor wrote:
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Greg Albrecht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> >> Sent: Friday, 19 January 2007 11:42 AM
> >> To: Murray Taylor
> >> Cc: freebsd-questions
> >> Subject: Re: Mail etiquette (was: What is this mean by this term)
> >>
> >> On 18/01/07, Murray Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>     
> >>>> "Top posting" is only one issue.  Others of great importance are
> >>>> trimming your posts, not breaking the lines into tiny 
> >>>>         
> >> fragments, and
> >>     
> >>>> not writing one-line paragraphs.  Your .sig is a good example of
> >>>> things that people should remove from replies.
> >>>>
> >>>> Greg
> >>>>         
> >>> Exactly! And not only my .sig which I do have control over whether
> >>> I add it or not, and also the [EMAIL PROTECTED] stupid corporate 
> >>>       
> >> disclaimer also
> >>     
> >>> (over which I have no control).... sigh
> >>>
> >>> mjt (no .sig)
> >>>       
> >> since i seem to be in the mood to muddy the waters today:
> >>
> >> have you considered using a mail address outside of your corporation?
> >> one which doesn't automatically add that disclaimer. i've never been
> >> fond of using my work email address for anything outside of work, but
> >> that's me. maybe this is an obvious answer but it is one way to please
> >> the etiquette overlords.
> >>
> >> -g
> >>
> >> -- 
> >> Greg Albrecht ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> >>     
> >
> > I started using the lists from work years ago when I was
> > establishing the FreeBSD servers and it was easier to get
> > Q&A stuff done... Since then the weenies have come along 
> > and changed out a perfectly servicable Postfix / Cyrus
> > mail system with M$ Exchg(barf), and the beanies wanted the 
> > disclaimers ......

Well, if they pay the bills then it is their right to do as they please.
I guess you could always start your own company and enforce any
regulations you desired.

> > sigh
> >
> >   
> 
> Have any of these disclaimers ever proven to be even the slightest bit 
> legally enforceable?
> 
> I mean, for God's sake, they're at the bottom of the message, 
> essentially telling you not to read the message you just read.  

I read something in a computer magazine, I am not sure which one, that
clearly stated that those disclaimers are not worth the paper they are
written on.

-- 
Gerard

_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to