> On Thu, 24 May 2007 19:11:27 -0400 (EDT)
> "kalin mintchev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> unless "at device 31.2 on pci0" points to some RAID evidence - which i
>> think it's false - than i read this as the ad6 disk sits there unused.
>> am i right?!
>
> FWIW, you can use gstat (as root) to see if a certain geom device (eg, any
> storage ) is being accessed, and its load.
the gstat is pretty cool. it shows something like this:
L(q) ops/s r/s kBps ms/r w/s kBps ms/w %busy Name
0 6 6 627 8.5 0 0 0.0 5.0| ad4
0 6 6 627 8.5 0 0 0.0 5.0| ad4s1
0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0| ad6
0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0| ad4s1a
0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0| ad4s1b
0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0| ad4s1c
0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0| ad4s1d
0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0| ad4s1e
0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0| ad4s1f
0 6 6 627 8.5 0 0 0.0 5.0| ad4s1g
how come there is ad4s1b and ad4s1c when those names don't appear in the
fstab or df?
thanks....
>
> it works at leat on 6.x - not sure about 5.x.
>
>
>
> _________________________
> {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
>
> "It is a lesson which all history teaches wise men, to put trust in ideas,
> and not in circumstances."
> Emerson
>
> I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when
> wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You
> have been Warned.
>
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
