On 6/15/07, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 06:51:31PM +0200, Albert Shih wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Anyone known what's the futur of ufs2 ? Is there any plan to make a ufs3
> for very large FS (> 2TB) . Or the plan is to use classic ufs for / & /usr
and lets
> use ZFS for /home
ZFS will remain an optional alternative because of the licensing, so
UFS and future derivatives are here to stay.
Yeah, but you know because of how nice ZFS is, a concept of using ZFS
for /home and UFS for everything else will probably turn into a
tradition or something. ;) Why couldn't one make it so you have ZFS
capability during a FreeBSD install, ZFS licensing isn't that bad is
it?
UFS2 does not have problems with creating filesystems >2TB so there is
no need for a UFS3 on that account.
Kris
--
Jim Capozzoli
D6499626857801B6065013E3645A6B75
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
