On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 10:01:14PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > Duane Winner wrote: > > > We've been having a problem with generating the ports Index ever since > > upgrading to emacs22. > > > > As per /usr/ports/UPDATING, we added EMACS_PORT_NAME=*emacs22* to > > /etc/make.conf > > Errr --- that should probably read: > > EMACS_PORT_NAME=emacs22 > > You certainly don't need the asterisks there. > > In any case, setting this variable will screw up indexing, because a > number of e-lisp ports will try and append the EMACS_PORT_NAME to > their package origin if it is set. However not all the ports that > do that also have a slave port 'foo-emacs22' hence the problems with > building the INDEX. > > The best answer is don't set EMACS_PORT_NAME in /etc/make.conf -- > emacs22 is the default now anyhow. The INDEX will build just fine, > and the various e-lisp packages seem to work OK as well, so long as > you've reinstall all the e-lisp packages once you've upgraded from > emacs21 to emacs22. > > Cheers, > > Matthew > > - -- > Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard > Flat 3 > PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate > Kent, CT11 9PW > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFGql0a8Mjk52CukIwRCJkgAJ0fh9qkl4eWFQRwrrG8DIwAOqUmlACeMT19 > 8AWFPYKQdh8Fvko14TCwyxs= > =vZLj > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Thanks! I've commented out the EMACS_PORT_NAME=emacs22 entry in /etc/make.conf. All seems well except on portupgrade -a, I'm getting ** Detected a package name change: apel-emacs22 (editors/apel) -> 'apel-emacs21' (editors/apel) ** No need to upgrade 'apel-emacs22-10.7_1' (>= apel-emacs21-10.7_1). (specify -f to force) ** Detected a package name change: flim-emacs22 (editors/flim) -> 'flim-emacs21' (editors/flim) ** No need to upgrade 'flim-emacs22-1.14.8_1' (>= flim-emacs21-1.14.8_1). (specify -f to force) ** Detected a package name change: mule-ucs-emacs22 (converters/mule-ucs) -> 'mule-ucs-emacs21' (converters/mule-ucs) ** No need to upgrade 'mule-ucs-emacs22-0.85.r3_1' (>= mule-ucs-emacs21-0.85.r3_1). (specify -f to force) ** Detected a package name change: semi-emacs22 (editors/semi) -> 'semi-emacs21' (editors/semi) ** No need to upgrade 'semi-emacs22-1.14.6_2' (>= semi-emacs21-1.14.6_2). (specify -f to force) ** Detected a package name change: emacs-w3m-emacs22 (www/emacs-w3m) -> 'emacs-w3m-emacs21' (www/emacs-w3m) ** No need to upgrade 'emacs-w3m-emacs22-1.4.4_3' (>= emacs-w3m-emacs21-1.4.4_3). (specify -f to force) Both running portupgrade -f apel-emacs22-10.7_1 etc. and running portupgrade -fr emacs failed. Many thanks for any ideas! Cheers, David _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
