> I don't think that's right. As I understand it, the argv argument to > execve() is passed-on directly as the child processes arguments, and > the parent can write whatever it likes into argv[0] - it's only > convention that it's a filename. So mailwrapper passes its own > argv[0] as sendmail's argv[0]. And so sendmail behaves as if it had been > invoked as mailq or whatever.
You're exactly right. I misread the man file and did a little test to confirm it. thanks... don -- Don Hinton <don.hinton at vanderbilt.edu> or <hintonda at gmail.com> Institute for Software Integrated Systems (ISIS), Vanderbilt University tel: 615.480.5667 or 615.870.9728 _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
