NetOpsCenter writes:
> Bill Moran wrote:
> >Is there any reason you can't use OOo 2.X?
>
> So I really dont care what the version is so long as the file
> names reflect what the freebsd install error 1 gives when it
> finishes its part.
1) Have you asked on the openoffice@ mailing list?
2) I'm with Bill - about the only reason to prefer 1.1 to 2.2.1
is lack of disk space.
3) I know from experience a suitable jdk is required (at least
during compilation) for the 2.x series to handle OpenDocument
formats. But the last I heard, it handles other formats natively.
Robert Huff
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
