Kirk Strauser said:
> The main difference is that a flac file can be decompressed into a
> bit-for-bit identical copy of the original file, whereas a decompressed
> mp3
> bears almost no resemblance to the original.
Yes, not the first time today someone thought I was confued. Thanks. I
thought a wav file and flac file occupied a similar place in the
food-compression chain. So a good option would be to go from wav -> flac
If I wanted to keep a lossless version of the recording around.
> You would probably sample your tapes into a wav file, edit it to your
> liking, then use flac for archival.
--
Joe Sotham
------------
If the only prayer you say in your entire life is "Thank You",
that will suffice.
- Meister Eckhart
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message