On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 18:43:22 +1100
Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> wrt to QEMU,i don't think is fast enough to make it worth it - i think you'd
> gain more by moving a bit to the side of freebsd for the host and using other
> options (linux+ Vmware + freebsd as guest)
I meant this in the context of using QEMU to run multiple simultaneous VMs for
server virtualisation. I think it works OK(ish) for , say, running Windows on
your bsd box....but i don't think you can compare it to something like Xen or
VMWare or MS Virtual Server
probably a bit behind Qemu in speed would be BOCHS, though I think it is a bit
more flexible wrt to the machines emulated.
B
_________________________
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
I sense much NT in you.
NT leads to Bluescreen.
Bluescreen leads to downtime.
Downtime leads to suffering.
NT is the path to the darkside.
Powerful Unix is.
I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet.
Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been
Warned.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
