On 03/02/2008, Christian Baer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 2 Feb 2008 21:38:49 -0600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Well, the best, I think. > > I take ist, you don't approve of ZFS? :-) > It is not a panacaea. The optimisation and sharing of r/w, Load balancing, And redundant data verification (to say nothing of the supposed ability to blindly stab disks into a nearly infinite array) are all features that I can see being appreciated. In a couple of processor generations. (I am talking desktop junk here) The kids running big iron will have already decided and my feeble arguments are like sand in a badger's vagina. -- -- _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
