Mel wrote:
On Thursday 06 March 2008 18:45:31 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have tried to re-build all of my ports, but gtk-2 is failing. Any
suggestions.
the comand I used last was:
portupgrade -Rf --batch gtk-2.12.3
iqr.la im-multipress.la > gtk.immodules
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libm.so.4" not found, required by
"libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0"
gmake[3]: *** [gtk.immodules] Error 1
gmake[3]: Leaving directory
`/usr/ports/x11-toolkits/gtk20/work/gtk+-2.12.8/modules/input'
gmake[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
gmake[2]: Leaving directory
`/usr/ports/x11-toolkits/gtk20/work/gtk+-2.12.8/modules'
gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
gmake[1]: Leaving directory
`/usr/ports/x11-toolkits/gtk20/work/gtk+-2.12.8' gmake: *** [all] Error 2
** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa
/tmp/portupgrade.13565.39 env UPGRADE_TOOL=portupgrade
UPGRADE_PORT=gtk-2.12.3 UPGRADE_PORT_VER=2.12.3 make BATCH=yes
** Fix the problem and try again.
** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed)
! x11-toolkits/gtk20 (gtk-2.12.3) (new compiler error)
gtk20 doesn't depend on gdk-pixbuf according to the port, but the gtk2's
configure script doesn't agree.
In short: the gnome-hack magic is not working for this as it doesn't add
gdkpixbuf to LIB_DEPENDS. You might wanna report this to the freebsd-gnome
list.
To make it work for you:
Just do portupgrade -f graphics/gdk-pixbuf, then portupgrade -Rf gtk20 again.
There's a change you'll run into the same with a different port this time,
then rinse and repeat.
I don't see this port graphics/gdk-pixbuf in the current ports tree.
--
Chris Maness
(909) 223-9179
http://www.chrismaness.com
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
