Am Freitag, den 07.03.2008, 18:45 +0100 schrieb Wouter de Jong: > Hi, > > We have 2 FreeBSD machines running as a firewall in a CARP+pf+pfsync setup. > Worked great, however ..... today I noticed something weird. > > I had to reboot the master machine, and when it came back ... > one of the CARP addresses no longer worked. > > Looking in the logs, I got carp4: incorrect hash > > And looking at the carp interface .... both machines were running MASTER for > this interface. > > Looking closer, I noticed my primary machine had this configuration : > > carp4: flags=49<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING> metric 0 mtu 1500 > inet 213.206.xx.62 netmask 0xfffffff0 > inet 213.206.xx.49 netmask 0xfffffff0 > carp: MASTER vhid 4 advbase 1 advskew 100 > > and my secondary : > > carp4: flags=49<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING> metric 0 mtu 1500 > inet 213.206.xx.49 netmask 0xfffffff0 > inet 213.206.xx.62 netmask 0xfffffff0 > carp: MASTER vhid 4 advbase 1 advskew 100 > > It swapped the carp alias alias (213.206.xx.62) to be the first address on > the interface. > This was the only interface it happened. > > The config : > > primary: > ############################## > defaultrouter="213.206.yy.193" > hostname="fw01.xxx.yyy" > > cloned_interfaces="carp0 carp1 carp2 carp3 carp4 carp5 carp6 carp7 carp8 > carp9 carp10 carp11 carp12 carp13 carp14 carp15 carp16 carp17 carp18 carp19 > carp20 carp21 carp22 carp23 carp24 carp25 carp26 carp27 carp28" > > ifconfig_bge0="inet 213.206.yy.194 netmask 255.255.255.240" > ifconfig_bge1="inet 213.206.xx.2 netmask 255.255.255.240" > ifconfig_bge1_alias0="inet 213.206.xx.18 netmask 255.255.255.240" > ifconfig_bge1_alias1="inet 213.206.xx.34 netmask 255.255.255.240" > ifconfig_bge1_alias2="inet 213.206.xx.50 netmask 255.255.255.240" > ifconfig_bge1_alias3="inet 213.206.xx.66 netmask 255.255.255.240" > ifconfig_bge1_alias4="inet 213.206.xx.82 netmask 255.255.255.240" > <etc,etc> > ifconfig_carp0="vhid 255 pass blubVIP0255 213.206.yy.206/28" > ifconfig_carp1="vhid 1 pass blubVIP0001 213.206.xx.1/28" > ifconfig_carp2="vhid 2 pass blubVIP0002 213.206.xx.17/28" > ifconfig_carp2_alias0="vhid 2 pass blubVIP0002 213.206.xx.30/28" > ifconfig_carp3="vhid 3 pass blubVIP0003 213.206.xx.33/28" > ifconfig_carp4="vhid 4 pass blubVIP0004 213.206.xx.49/28" > ifconfig_carp4_alias0="vhid 4 pass blubVIP0004 213.206.xx.62/28" > ifconfig_carp5="vhid 5 pass blubVIP0005 213.206.xx.65/28" > ifconfig_carp6="vhid 6 pass blubVIP0006 213.206.xx.81/28" > ############################## > > secondary: > ############################## > defaultrouter="213.206.yy.193" > hostname="fw02.xxx.yyy" > > cloned_interfaces="carp0 carp1 carp2 carp3 carp4 carp5 carp6 carp7 carp8 > carp9 carp10 carp11 carp12 carp13 carp14 carp15 carp16 carp17 carp18 carp19 > carp20 carp21 carp22 carp23 carp24 carp25 carp26 carp27 carp28" > > ifconfig_bge0="inet 213.206.yy.195 netmask 255.255.255.240" > ifconfig_bge1="inet 213.206.xx.3 netmask 255.255.255.240" > ifconfig_bge1_alias0="inet 213.206.xx.19 netmask 255.255.255.240" > ifconfig_bge1_alias1="inet 213.206.xx.35 netmask 255.255.255.240" > ifconfig_bge1_alias2="inet 213.206.xx.51 netmask 255.255.255.240" > ifconfig_bge1_alias3="inet 213.206.xx.67 netmask 255.255.255.240" > ifconfig_bge1_alias4="inet 213.206.xx.83 netmask 255.255.255.240" > <etc,etc> > ifconfig_carp0="vhid 255 advskew 100 pass blubVIP0255 213.206.yy.206/28" > ifconfig_carp1="vhid 1 advskew 100 pass blubVIP0001 213.206.xx.1/28" > ifconfig_carp2="vhid 2 advskew 100 pass blubVIP0002 213.206.xx.17/28" > ifconfig_carp2_alias0="vhid 2 advskew 100 pass blubVIP0002 213.206.xx.30/28" > ifconfig_carp3="vhid 3 advskew 100 pass blubVIP0003 213.206.xx.33/28" > ifconfig_carp4="vhid 4 advskew 100 pass blubVIP0004 213.206.xx.49/28" > ifconfig_carp4_alias0="vhid 4 advskew 100 pass blubVIP0004 213.206.xx.62/28" > ifconfig_carp5="vhid 5 advskew 100 pass blubVIP0005 213.206.xx.65/28" > ifconfig_carp6="vhid 6 advskew 100 pass blubVIP0006 213.206.xx.81/28" > ############################## > > After rebooting the secondary, it still gave me incorrect hash. > But, it gave me the same thing on carp2 now. ... however, here the secondary > had the carp2_alias0 listed as first, > where as the primary had the carp2 as first, and the carp2_alias0 as second > address. > > How can this ever happen ? > > Now I'm redundant .... but I must pray that the addresses will come up in > the same order. > > Never had this issue on FreeBSD 6.x(p*)-RELEASE, but now I'm running FreeBSD > 7.0-RELEASE. > > Help ! :) > > > Kind regards, > > Wouter de Jong > The Netherlands
Same happend to me :-/ But with 6.3-p* and 7.0 ... No idea yet. Any help is welcome :-) Thx Norman _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"