On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 12:04:34 -0500 Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Peter Boosten([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2008.11.29 17:34:28 +0100: > > Yeah, in 1845 it was. Sendmail is as secure as any other mta. And > > using > > Simply not true. Sendmail has had TONS of remote vulnerabilities. Many > people have fallen victims to exploits and had their servers rooted.
May be, but still, sendmail is -AS SECURE AS ANY OTHER MTA- now! When do stop looking back to bitch on sendmail? If you don't like it, don't use it. > qmail has never had a remote root vulnerability or a similar flaw > because it's designed with security in mind. Not only with security. Also with lack of possiblities. > Sendmail never was. But it is still the most used mta worldwide. -- Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D + http://nagual.nl/ | SunOS sxce snv103 ++ + All that's really worth doing is what we do for others (Lewis Carrol) _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
